Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Formal Analysis of Norman Fishing Village















From 1850 to 1874, the coasts of Normandy in France experienced a migration of Bourgeois travelers from Paris to the area. This traveling population was made possible by the new railway system put in place that provided access to the coastal areas that were previously inaccessible. The new railway system allowed travelers to travel to these coastal areas within a matter of hours as opposed to several days by carriage. From the wave of travelers also came artists arriving eager to depict the beauty of the sea and quaint villages that resided along the coast.




Eugene Isabey (1803-1886), whose work was influenced by his studies and work in the Louvre Museum and life living among other emerging Impressionist artists in the Montmartre area in Paris, gives his interpretation of a Norman fishing village during this time. His Norman Fishing Village, oil on canvas French Impressionist painting, provides a glimpse into the activities of these small fishing villages located along the Norman coast. Immediately viewing the work, the eye is drawn to the fishing village. Rectangular and triangular shapes form the outlines of the village as well as the whiteness in the depiction in the painted clouds just behind the village building. Long straight vertical lines are used to emphasize the tallness of the first building, which the eye is drawn to, in the forefront that seems to overlook and tower over the sandy colored beach. The artist creates detail in the building by using short thin horizontal and vertical lines to create windows, doors, and shingles on the initial building in the painting. Texture within the initial village building is created by using brush strokes that create patterns of roughness. The noticeable horizontal and vertical strokes give the appearance of grains of wood on the building. Depth is created within the village by the artist with the use of atmospheric perspective from the left portion of the painting to the right. The first village building is vibrant compared to the other buildings depicted with its various shaded browns, and then fades into a grayish geometric mass as it proceeds into the distance. Isabey also creates depth in the painting by the use of overlapping of the buildings one after the other to create the illusion of a row of darkly shaded buildings along the Norman coast line, as well as shadowing to created depth along the rows of buildings.




Isabey utilizes linear perspective to draw the eye down the stair way to the shores of the beach. The stairway exhibits strong parallel lines using paint with a lighter tint of brown than the initial village building to direct and guided the eye down the stair way. The depiction of deeply shaded greens flowing over the lighter brown stairway creates interest as the eye is also guided down the stairs by a person in a dark blue form. The scene at the bottom involves the organic forms of two people around a small boat with gently curving thin lines colored in various shaded browns, a shade darker than the stairway. Darkly shaded complimentary colors form small masses in the boat in smooth textures suggesting the accoutrement of a fishing excursion. The artist uses warm, sandy colors on the beach to demonstrate atmospheric perspective as the beach gently fades into the glossy textured darkly shaded bluish sea.




The overall depiction of the painting is balanced by the use of warm colors in the village on the left and the cool smooth textures of the bluish sky and sea to the right. The straight lines of the initial village building are balanced by the curved lines by the fading atmospheric perspective of the village into the distance and the vast sky and sea. The warm colors in the village create warmth and interest that are balanced by the intrigue and mystery of the sky and sea. These elements suggest the warmth the artist must have felt upon encountering a small quaint Norman fishing village coupled with the mystery and intrigue of a life at sea.




Thursday, March 11, 2010

Paragone Group Discussion

Paragone Group Discussion
Carla Chavez, Decarlo Coleman, Katelyn Crockett, and Jennifer Daniel

After completing or group discussions, we definitely had some opinions to express in comparing DeVinci’s painting versus Michelangelo’s sculpture. We also had our own different experiences with trying to create these types of art as well. For the members in the group who consider themselves not to be too on the artsy side, this project was a definite challenge right from the start. Even those who were not new to the art seen were surprised at the level of difficulty that came with it. It is safe to say that our entire group has a new respect and appreciation for anyone who is an artist. We all came to the conclusion that one type of art is not superior to the other. Different ideas about which may leave more room for error did come up, but it were agreed that both took time, effort, and skill. The paragone group discussion proved to be a good idea. It was an intellectual way to compare and contrast the process that goes behind different styles of art. In our group’s discussion, we were able to express our thoughts on our experiences with the different types of art. As for Leonardo’s paragone he did pay respect for the most part to each type of art he spoke on. We as a group had different ideas as to what the strong and weak parts were in his paragone, so no mutual consensus was reached. However, as with the whole discussion, we all seemed to understand that no idea was right or wrong, merely different. It is what makes art and its many forms so interesting.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Standing in the Shoes- Michelangelo



Carla Chavez

Making a sculpting out of soap wasn’t quite what I thought it was going to be. I went through about 4 “practice” bars of soap before I finally came up with the sculpture I submitted. I chose to go with an abstract piece because I sort of just wanted to see where it would end up if I just kind of went with the flow. It was interesting seeing how I would try and make one shape or design and it would look like something else. It made me see how difficult it must have been to sculpt with real marble or clay. I can only imagine the time and dedication that it took the artists to create their masterpieces.

Standing in the Shoes- Michelangelo


Katelyn Crockett

At the beginning it was difficult to carve the soap. It was very hard
and sometimes too much of the soap chipped off making it so that I had
to shave or carve even more of the soap to even it out. it was a lot
more difficult than i thought. Sculptors who carve marble and give it a
perfect smooth finish are quite talented and committed to their work it
seems.

Standing in the Shoes- Da Vinci


DeCarlo Coleman

The atmospheric perspective in the sketch is shown by the small size of the fisherman in the background and the distance between the fisherman and his bait kit which is in the foreground. The bait kit appears larger in scale compared to the fisherman being that it is in the foreground. The vanishing point is shown through the fish that was caught on the line. There was also a bit of cast shadowing that was expressed on the dock by the bait kit, fishing net and wooden dock posts. The shadowing on the bait kit and fishing hat in the bottom right corner emphasizes the sunlight coming from the left.

Standing in the Shoes- Da Vinci


Jennifer Daniel

Atmospheric perspective is depicted in the picture by the difference in scale of the desk in relation to the coast and lighthouse. The desk is also darker than the lighthouse and surrounding ocean. The desk is depicted in the foreground and in the picture that displays the difference between the two. The vanishing point is the moon where the lamp and lighthouse follow in line to the moon.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Casa Calvet


Casa Calvet
Casa Calvet was chosen because it is the only building Antoni Gaudi received an award for which won Building of the Year from the City of Barcelona in 1900. It has five levels, the ground floor consists of office space and the rest is living space. This project initially was to begin in March of 1898, but the municipal architect rejected the plans because Casa Calvet's proposed height exceeded City established regulations for that street. Upon receiving this information Antoni Gaudi chose not to adjust the plans to meet regulations, he sent the plans back with a line through the façade, threatening to simply cut off the top of the building. City officials did not reply to this threat and construction finally began according to Gaudi’s original plans in January of 1899. The stone façade, bay windows, sculptural decorations, and many of the interior features of Casa Calvet reflect Baroque influences. For the first two floors Antoni Gaudi designed the furniture full of color along with the rest of the interior.